The Technical Evidence for a Bear Market Decline   (October 3, 2011)


What is the technical evidence for a Bull or Bear market? If we keep it simple, the evidence is solidly Bearish.

Without getting too fancy, let's look for technical evidence of a Bull or Bear market in today's charts. On a day-to-day basis, the market has experienced huge swings: a nightmare for trend-followers who have been whipsawed repeatedly in the past two months, and a dream for short-term traders:

Is this sort of manic-depressive volatility a sign of a healthy Bull market? No, it isn't. Extended periods of wild swings from euphoria and hope to fear and despair typify markets that are about to break down.

Equally bearish is the market's inability to climb back above the 50-day moving average, which is declining and offering a solid band of resistance, and MACD's inability to regain the neutral line. Instead, this indicator has turned back down.

Without resorting to some very fancy slight-of-hand, is there anything remotely bullish in this chart?

Let's as the same question of the weekly chart of the S&P 500 (SPX):

Once again, keeping it simple, we notice the uncanny power of the 200-week moving average (MA) to provide key support and resistance. The rally off the March 2009 lows bounced off this line as resistance in May 2010; when it finally surmounted it in late 2010, the market rallied solidly for six months.

The SPX has already broken through the support offered by the 50-week MA, and is now testing the 200-week level.

Back in 2009, the market's break below the critical 200-week MA in the sand and its failure to regain it presaged the slide from 1250 to 670.

Also mirroring the 2008 setup is MACD, which is once again solidly below the neutral line and declining.

Here's what markets do when they break critical support: they re-test lows. That sets up an eventual target for this decline of 670, which would be a re-test of the March 2009 lows.

Bulls have to answer this question: once the 200-week MA is broken, why shouldn't this market re-test the recent low? If it's "different this time," what makes it different from every other era and market?

Lastly, for context, let's look at a chart of the SPX from 1965 to the present:

This chart suggests an eventual target around 600, even lower than the March 2009 lows.

It might be a good time to recall that index funds are only "safe" in the sense that they aggregate the risk of all stocks in the index. A market that declines 40% will take index funds down 40%. There is nothing "safe" about long-equity funds that track a market heading down.

Nobody knows what will happen tomorrow, much less 30 days from now or three months from now, but as of this snapshot of the market, the evidence of a Bear market decline is rather substantial, and the technical evidence of a Bull market is rather thin. As the saying goes, keep it simple.

Once again my time online will be severely limited for the next few weeks. Posts and email will be sporadic at best. Thank you for your understanding and patience.


If this recession strikes you as different from previous downturns, you might be interested in my new book An Unconventional Guide to Investing in Troubled Times (print edition) or Kindle ebook format. You can read the ebook on any computer, smart phone, iPad, etc. Click here for links to Kindle apps and Chapter One. The solution in one word: Localism.


Readers forum: DailyJava.net.



My new book is available in both print and ebook formats: An Unconventional Guide to Investing in Troubled Times (print edition) or Kindle ebook format. You can read the ebook now on any computer, smart phone, iPad, etc. Click here for links to Kindle apps and Chapter One.

Order Survival+: Structuring Prosperity for Yourself and the Nation (free bits) (Mobi ebook) (Kindle) or Survival+ The Primer (Kindle) or Weblogs & New Media: Marketing in Crisis (free bits) (Kindle) or from your local bookseller.

Of Two Minds Kindle edition: Of Two Minds blog-Kindle





"This guy is THE leading visionary on reality. He routinely discusses things which no one else has talked about, yet, turn out to be quite relevant months later."
--Walt Howard, commenting about CHS on another blog.


NOTE: contributions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Michael H. ($5/mo), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.   Thank you, Alan B. ($5/mo), for your much-appreciated generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.




Or send him coins, stamps or quatloos via mail--please request P.O. Box address.

Subscribers ($5/mo) and contributors of $50 or more this year will receive a weekly email of exclusive (though not necessarily coherent) musings and amusings, and an offer of a small token of my appreciation: a signed copy of a novel or Survival+ (either work admirably as doorstops).

At readers' request, there is also a $10/month option.

The "unsubscribe" link is for when you find the usual drivel here insufferable.

 
 
Your readership is greatly appreciated with or without a donation.
For more on this subject and a wide array of other topics, please visit my weblog.

                                                           


All content, HTML coding, format design, design elements and images copyright © 2011 Charles Hugh Smith, All rights reserved in all media, unless otherwise credited or noted.

I would be honored if you linked this essay to your site, or printed a copy for your own use.


                                                           


 





Making your Amazon purchases
through this Search Box helps
support oftwominds.com
at no cost to you:


Add oftwominds.com to your reader:

Survival+   blog  fiction/novels   articles  my hidden history   books/films   what's for dinner   home   email me