|
|
Musings Report 2017:45 11-12-17 Social Media & Mobile Phones Fall From Grace: Addiction
You are receiving this email because you are one of the 500+ subscribers/major contributors to www.oftwominds.com.
For those who are new to the Musings reports: they are basically a glimpse into my notebook, the unfiltered swamp where I organize future themes, sort through the dozens of stories and links submitted by readers, refine my own research and start connecting dots which appear later in the blog or in my books. As always, I hope the Musings spark new appraisals and insights. Thank you for supporting the site and for inviting me into your circle of correspondents.
Thank You, New Patrons and Subscribers
A warm welcome to everyone who responded to my rattling the begging bowl this weekend. Your support of the Of Two Minds blog is much appreciated!
Social Media & Mobile Phones Fall From Grace: Addiction
For everyone who remembers the Early Days of social media and mobile phones, it's been quite a ride from My Space and awkward texting on tiny screens to the current alarm over the addictive nature of social media and mobile telephony.
The emergence of withering criticism of Facebook and Google is a new and remarkably broad-based phenomenon: a year or two ago, there was little mainstream-media criticism of these tech giants; now there is a constant barrage of sharp criticism across the media spectrum.
Even the technology writer for the Wall Street Journal has not just curbed his enthusiasm, he's now speaking in the same dark tones as other critics: Why Personal Tech Is Depressing.
The critique of social media and its handmaiden, mobile telephony, has reached surprising heights in a remarkably short time. Consider this article from the Guardian (UK) which compares Facebook and Google's social media empire to world religions in terms of scale, and unabashedly calls them addictive and detrimental to health and democracy:
How Facebook and Google threaten public health – and democracy.
A decade ago, social media was considerably different. One of the first social media sites to break into the mainstream was My Space, which began as a forum for bands to post new songs and interact with their fans. This was a great tool for thousands of musicians who had few ways to publicly post their songs and establish public communications with their fans. My Space was a useful idea, and even I posted a few songs my friends and I had recorded.
Around the same time frame, Facebook was limited to college students. I recall reading about FB and going to the site to see what it was all about: the splash screen asked you for your college affiliation.
Mobile telephony featured tiny little screens and an awkward double-click method of texting that only teens could master.
Keeping up on mass-media related technologies is part of my job as a blogger, as bloggers inhabit a little village of the mass-media world that seems to be shrinking as social media expands. I joined Twitter in June 2008, about two years after its initial launch, and Facebook in 2009. As I've noted in the blog, I use them sparingly, and primarily as outreach for my own content.
I was struck by this quote from the above Guardian article:
"The term 'addiction' is no exaggeration. The average consumer checks his or her smartphone 150 times a day, making more than 2,000 swipes and touches. The applications they use most frequently are owned by Facebook and Alphabet (Google), and the usage of those products is still increasing."
Wow! Do you check your mobile phone 100+ times a day? I only look at my phone to see if it needs to be charged, and only pick it up to respond to a text or call. These are so infrequent that many days I don't touch my phone at all.
I think we can safely call anything that people interrupt sex to do (like check their mobile phones) addictive.
What's the source of social media and mobile telephony's addictive power?
I think we can start with the innate attraction of distractions and novelty. The higher the density of inputs in our environment, the more quickly we become bored and fidgety. So we turn to our phones for distraction and novelty.
Being social creatures, we want to stay connected to our tribe, group, family, etc. Social media and mobile phones feed this desire directly.
But social media and mobile telephony have peculiar qualities that are unlike actual face-to-face interaction. They don't require the same kind of commitment or engagement; it's understood everyone can log off at any time.
It's also easier to dump on people in the safety of anonymity.
While many people form longlasting online friendships, myself included, as a generalization social media tends to superficiality because it rewards being "liked", i.e. receiving positive feedback, even from those we don't even know.
The broad reach of the dynamic of winning approval is explored in this Guardian article on the rise of "fake news": How did the news go ‘fake’? When the media went social.
As social creatures, we all desire a positive standing in our tribe, and the respect and approval of our peers. Social media is like a lens that can make us appear bigger, shinier and more deserving of respect than we might otherwise be.
The temptation to post self-congratulatory Christmas letters ("Josh just graduated with honors, Mia is on her semester abroad, my new painting won first prize, and we're all meeting in Barbados for the holiday"), or divulge TMI (too much information) to elicit sympathy is strong; it's also tempting to express righteous indignation to solicit "likes" from like-minded members of our ideological tribe.
I've commented previously on the relative poverty of opportunities to feel respected and admired in our society; most of us don't have a lot of power or control over our lives, nor do we have the high-status positions and signifiers that automatically earn respect in our centralized, hierarchical social structure.
I think we should acknowledge the power of our natural desire to "be somebody" in our social circle, and in the world at large, and acknowledge the attraction of social media in furthering this desire.
So by all means, we should honor Josh and Mia's accomplishments, and proudly display our winning painting, and post photos of our fabulous family holiday. But we also have to acknowledge that "likes" online are not substitutes for the recognition and respect of a real-world circle of peers, or for the self-respect we all desire.
Social media is real enough in its own terms, but it is not a substitute for real life. Perhaps this is the addictive pull of social media: the idea that we can substitute a made-up, carefully controlled social-media self for our less-than-perfect real-world self.
If Facebook vanished, our "real" lives would still be intact. If we turned off our phones and social media, how much would we miss them in a week, or a month? How much "smaller" would we become? What would we lose, and how much of ourselves would we lose? These are questions worth exploring, for identifying social media and mobile phones as addictive is far from the whole story.
Summary of the Blog This Past Week
Beat the Crowd 11/11/17
The Fetid Swamp of Tax Reform 11/10/17
Where are Europe's Fault Lines? 11/9/17
Our Culture of Rape 11/10/17
How Will Bitcoin React in a Financial Crisis Like 2008? 11/8/17
The Big Reversal: Inflation and Higher Interest Rates Are Coming Our Way 11/7/17
Best Thing That Happened To Me This Week
Finally finished the rewrite of my next book, a grueling multi-month process. If I'm very lucky, I'll make minimum wage for this work, which is a lot better than zero.
Market Musings: Five More Years of a Bull Market, or Five Months?
I found the following chart in this blog post, which argues that the chart suggests the Bull Market in stocks has another five years to run: If History Repeating; Another Five Years For Equity Bull Market.
The first thing I noticed is the author started his chart in 2013. Hmm, didn't the current Bull Market start in March of 2009? So shouldn't we add four years?
Here's a chart that is less gamed. This chart shows the current Bull Market has reached extremes far above the previous dot-com and housing bubbles.
This chart suggests the current Bull Market has perhaps 5 months more to run, not 5 years.
Central banks have resorted to unprecedented tricks to keep the current Bull Market alive, buying trillions of dollars, yen, yuan and euros of bonds and stocks.
Can these asset-buying binges prop up a permanent Bull Market that never goes down? That seems to be the intent. As I've noted before, buying assets solves some problems but not all problems can be so easily papered over.
From Left Field
Early Facebook investor compares the social network to Nazi propaganda-- wow... we never saw this kind of attack a year ago...
Time-travel to 1971 San Francisco, Berkeley with tech pioneer's incredible street photos -- how did we live without social media and mobile phones?
"I just had these melodies and ideas in my head" (video) Alma Deutscher is a 12-year-old British musical virtuoso, not just on piano and violin, but as a composer too. Alma tells Scott Pelley that it's normal for her to walk around "having melodies popping into my head"
Swearing Is Good for You by Emma Byrne; How to Swear by Stephen Wildish -- or just become a carpenter....
Mystery of the incredibly detailed 3,500-year-old sealstone that was found buried with an ancient Greek warrior -- the mysterious Mycenaeans...
How Two Decades of ‘Socialization’ Has Ruined You -- schooling...
Industrial farming is one of the worst crimes in history -- but it makes meat cheap...
Germany's Romantic literary revival built on Blade Runner and seven deadly sins -- never heard of this literary genre befiore...
How colonial violence came home: the ugly truth of the first world war -- not the conventional interpretation...
Media and Transparency: An Introduction to Byung-Chul Han in English -- Korean-German philosopher....
One Hundred Thousand Beating Hearts - video (via Chad D.)
Prehistoric, Dinosaur-Era Shark With Insane Teeth Found Swimming Off Coast of Portugal -- lives deep enough to avoid human-caused extinction...
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." Aristotle
Thanks for reading--
charles |
|
|
|
|
|
