|
How Many Foreclosures Will Hit the Market?
(May 1, 2006)
OK people, stay sharp. We're going to thread our way through a lot of housing
statistics and reach a mind-boggling conclusion: 5 million foreclosures,
5 million investment/2nd homes dumped on the market and bank/thrift losses of $500 billion.
Farfetched? Read on.
First up is housing Bull Michael Youngblood, managing director of asset-backed securities
(a.k.a. mortgage-backed securities) at Friedman, Billings Ramsey who states in this week's Barron's: "What dominates
the mortgage market is income." In other words, if people have jobs, housing will continue
to rise. He goes on to assert that interest-only loans are not more dangerous than fixed-rate
mortgages. Leaving aside that Mr. Youngblood earns his living selling "securitized" mortgages
(if people stop paying the mortgage, the value of the security plummets--not that you'd hear
that from Mr. Youngblood), let's look at his thesis.
The chart above shows job growth in Colorado to be better than in the nation as a whole
(unemployment is a low 4.7% nationally). Next, look at the chart of
Colorado adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs). Even as fixed-rate mortgage rates dropped to historic lows,
over 50% of the loans in Colorado were ARMs.
According to Mr. Youngblood, everything should be hunky-dory. But the reality is that
foreclosures are skyrocketing in Colorado, and are 3 times higher than the national average;
from National Foreclosures Up 63 Percent From a Year Ago:
Colorado’s foreclosure rate leapfrogged to highest among the states thanks to a 31 percent
increase in new foreclosures from the previous month. The state reported 5,392 properties
entering some stage of foreclosure in March, a foreclosure rate of one new foreclosure for
every 339 households — more than three times the national average.
So much for Youngblood's cheery (if baseless) thesis. Here is a state with strong job growth and plentiful
ARMs--and foreclosures are leaping. The stark reality of foreclosures is not isolated
to Colorado, as this chart of Texas foreclosures shows. The situation in Boston is equally
perilous, as reported in the
Homeowners stretched perilously from the
Christian Science Monitor of 3/21/06:
Fully 27.1 percent of Boston's homeowners with a mortgage spent at least half their gross
income on housing in 2004, according to the latest census figures available. Those costs,
which include utilities and insurance as well as mortgage payments, were more than double
the national rate of 11.7 percent and topped New York (25.9 percent), Los Angeles (26.5),
San Francisco (20.4), and Chicago (20.3). Of the 25 biggest cities, only Miami had a higher
rate (35.8 percent).
The number of homes sold in Massachusetts dropped a whopping 21 percent in January compared
with a year ago, the largest year-to-year decrease in monthly home sales in a decade. As a
result, home values have begun to soften.
Such pressures are forcing a rising number of homeowners to erase their debts by forfeiting
their homes. Foreclosure filings in the county that includes Boston nearly doubled in January
from a year ago, ForeclosuresMass says.
When 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages were standard, a rise in interest rates would have
little effect on current homeowners. But in an era of adjustable-rate loans, it can exact
a toll which is especially difficult for minorities, housing experts say, because they are most
likely to hold higher-cost subprime loans.
USA Today chips in with this story on the woes facing the millions of homeowners stuck with
ARMs:
Some homeowners struggle to keep up with adjustable rates
When they refinanced their home two years ago to pay off some bills, Robert, now 78, was
working as a deliveryman. But his employer went out of business last April. Now he and
Lorraine, 72, a retired nurse, are both seeking work. The rate on their mortgage has jumped
from 7% to 10.5%.
Now, the real estate market is cooling, interest rates are rising and tens of thousands more
Americans are starting to have trouble paying their mortgages. Nearly 25% of mortgages —
10 million — carry adjustable interest rates. And most of them went to people with subpar
credit ratings who accepted higher interest rates, according to the Mortgage Bankers
Association.
Already, in West Virginia, Alabama, Michigan, Missouri and Tennessee, about one in five
homeowners with a high-interest (subprime) ARM was at least 30 days late at the end of last
year, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. After 90 days, the foreclosure clock
starts ticking.
These adjustable-rate loans were concentrated in the hottest markets, such as California,
where about 60% of all loans last year were interest-only or payment-option ARMs. That's the
highest such rate in the country.
Of the 7.7 million households who took out ARMs over the past two years to buy or refinance,
up to 1 million could lose their homes through foreclosure over the next five years because
they won't be able to afford their mortgage payments, and their homes will be worth less
than they owe, according to Cagan's research. The losses to the banking industry, he estimates,
will exceed $100 billion. That's less than the damage from the savings-and-loan crisis in the
1990s, which cost the country $150 billion.
The Browns in Missouri have had a happy ending. The lender, Saxon Mortgage Services in Texas,
declined to discuss the Browns' case with USA TODAY last week. But within 24 hours of a call
from a reporter, Saxon agreed to give the couple a fixed-rate loan at 7%.
Hmm, nothing like a little media snooping to pry a fixed-rate mortgage out of the
woodwork, eh? This tale reveals how subprime lenders have taken advantage of desperate/
hopeful/ignorant homeowners who are stunned to find their rates rising 3.5% in one bound.
Realtors, of course, couldn't be happier selling empty condos and houses by the millions
to unwary investors.
Second Home Sales Hit Another Record in 2005; Market Share Rises
27.7 percent of all homes purchased in 2005 were for investment and another 12.2 percent were
vacation homes. All together, there were 3.34 million second-home sales in 2005, up 16.0
percent from an upwardly revised total of 2.88 million in 2004. The market share of second
homes rose from 36.0 percent of transactions in 2004 to 39.9 percent in 2005.
Vacation-home sales increased 16.9 percent last year to a record 1.02 million from a
downwardly revised 872,000 in 2004, while investment-home sales rose 15.7 percent to a
record 2.32 million in 2005 from an upwardly revised 2.00 million in 2004.*
As the market softens, investors are finding that they can't dump their units for love
nor money. Here is a Washington Post story
investors hurting; Doors Close for Real Estate Speculators
After Pushing Up Prices, Investors Are Left Holding Too Many Homes.
Just for context: according to the National Association of Realtors,
There were 7,072,000 existing-home sales in all of 2005, up 4.2 percent from 6,784,000 in 2004.
This is the fifth consecutive annual record; NAR began tracking the sales series in 1968.
According the U.S. Census Bureau,
1.3 million new homes sold in 2005.The Census Bureau also reports that there are
approximately 75 million homeowners in the U.S., and 33 milllion occupied rental units.
Let's summarize:
millions of recent buyers are spending more than 50% of their income on housing,
leaving them extraordinarily vulnerable to job losses and ARM resets.
As the chart to the right from the FDIC shows, 5% of U.S. homebuyers (about 4 million)
would never have qualified had mortgage standards not been radically lowered over the past decade
(see my story on FDIC predicts foreclosures for more on this chart.)
Some 10 million properties have been purchased in the past 3 years as investments (or
if you prefer fig leafs, as "second homes"). Many of these investors are vulnerable to the same
ARM resets and job losses subprime borrowers face.
In a nutshell: in the past 3 years, 10 million people signed ARM mortgages which will
reset soon, and 10 million housing units were sold to investors. Foreclosures are already
rising, even though job growth is strong and unemployment is low. In addition, 4 million
recent homebuyers are subprime risks whose grasp on their homes is tenuous indeed.
If 5 million marginal bubble-buyers fold their hands due to ARM resets or job loss,
what will that do to the value of those 10 million investment units? Let's say the
resulting drop in values causes half of those empty, cash-flow negative units to get dumped
on the market (or foreclosed upon). Who's going to buy these 10 million properties?
One last chart. Bank reserves--the cash lenders keep to cover "bad loans"--is at an all-time
low. That leaves lenders extraordinarily vulnerable to losses should foreclosures rise.
The expert quoted above estimated bank and thrift losses of $100 billion should 1 million
homes go into foreclosure, so what happens if 5 million properties default? Simple
extrapolation suggests losses would exceed $500 billion. Does that sound extreme? Not
at all, when you consider that the dot-com bubble bursting erased at least $1 trillion in
equity. Compared to that, a mere half-trillion in losses doesn't seem unrealistic.
For more on this subject and a wide array of other topics, please visit
my weblog.
copyright © 2006 Charles Hugh Smith. All rights reserved in all media.
I would be honored if you linked this wEssay to your site, or printed a copy for your own use.
|
|