|
What Are the Risks of Hyper-Inflation?
(January 11, 2008)
More than a few citizens are worried about the possibilty of a hyper-inflationary
cycle taking hold in the U.S.--a cycles which would impoverish everyone.
New correspondent Scott M. describes the situation and reaches an important
conclusion:
Thank you for your most recent submission on Inflation/Deflation and Purchasing Power.
I have been a loyal reader of your site for about the past year, and while always interested
in your commentaries on the markets in particular, was moved to make a comment for the
first time.
I too have been sucked into too many expert opinions on whether we will experience I
nflation/Deflation or some other esoteric academic iteration or combination of the two.
If one looks one can find the concept hotly debated on the web ad nausem (not to imply
criticism of the web as at least we can enter into the debate, unlike with mainstream
media). Alternatively one can read the commentary of experts (economists and the like)
and be swayed back an forth by one side or another.
For a time I became captivated and
obsessed with learning the answer to the question. Your submission has clarified and
simplified the problem for me. However I cannot help thinking that there are still
practical realities and impacts to me as an individual investor – depending on whether
we experience hyper inflation generally, or a general decline in the cost of housing,
consumable products, etc. brought about by an oversupply and a lack of demand
(essentially because the spending mania has or will soon end).
First and foremost you are essentially correct. What matters to me, as an individual,
is what my unique experience will be in the face of what is known and or can be reasonably
projected (for example rising food prices, lower big screen TV prices, higher gas prices,
and stable or falling house prices). It is clear to me (more clear after reading your
blog) that their will be both gains and losses in purchasing power. It’s the net effect
in your circumstance that matters most. For those that planned well there may be
significant gains in purchasing power. I for example,
sold my house 18 months ago, rented a condo, invested one half of the equity in safe
interest bearing vehicles and the other half in Gold and Oil/Gas investments. I am also
a Canadian and we are fortunate that our currency has done well relative to the rest of
the world – at least of late. So far so good. For perhaps many more individuals – who
perhaps have not planned ahead, I fear that there will be a significant and continual
loss of purchasing power.
Am I worried that my equity investments are susceptible to
a potential deflationary spiral? Yes. The reason is that less purchasing power in
the population generally, means less aggregate spending. Less spending means less
demand for goods. Less demand means overcapacity. Overcapacity means lower prices.
Eventually less demand for goods and services in general (and agreed not for everything
like healthcare, gas, food, etc.), will mean lower corporate profits.
Lower corporate
profits means lower stock market prices, fewer jobs, etc. One could then make the
argument for a downward spiral ala Japan. If that is the consequence then my purchasing
power has been negatively impacted if I do not prepare accordingly (e.g. increase the
cash component).
One often reads that Bernake, as any good Central Banker would, fears “deflation”, and
will flood the “system” with money thereby forestalling deflation but as a necessary
consequence, will cause prices to increase (agreed the incorrect definition of inflation).
Nobody has properly defined what “flooding the system with money” actually means. At
least not to me. How does this money get into the hands of the debt satiated consumer
who apparently is a key ingredient of the economy (to the tune of about 70% of GDP)?
Is it simply as easy as offering 1 % interest rates to the masses? Of course the
deflationists take up the argument and say that you can lead a horse to water but you
can’t make him drink (in other words lower rates and more and easy credit will not
induce more spending) when (1) banks are not willing participants, (2) credit is “maxed
out”, and (3) people suddenly “get” that it makes sense to save.
But what if the
hyper-inflationists are right, and one last time the masses are granted this easy
money and they in turn drive up the price of all goods. Not just gas, food and
healthcare (that are clearly going there anyway) but stocks, Chinese made electronics,
and perhaps even Real Estate once again? While I am confident that the value of my
gold and gold stocks will appreciate at an even greater rate than general prices,
I still have to prepare in a different way for this consequence, do I not? (e.g.
decrease my cash component).
There are no easy answers, but at least you are bringing the debate down (from the
lofty academic level) to the practical and individual level. I hope that you will
continue the debate this topic in light of my questions and confusion - which I am
sure is shared by many.
Perhaps it can be boiled down to one simple question. While
the impact of whatever happens (inflation or deflation) is a function of each
individual’s circumstances, is it not true that what happens to the general population
(ie either a mass loss of purchasing power, or an illusionary increase in purchasing
power through dollar devaluation) will in turn impact the individual investor and how
they should plan?
Excellent point. Scott. A cycle of hyper-inflation or deflation will certainly affect
individual investors. I believe the following simple chart definitively answers the
question of just how likely hyper-inflation might be.
The question this chart poses is this: would The Powers That Be who own the vast
majority of the nation's wealth and influence its policies allow those policies to
effectively destroy their wealth?
I think it is very safe to say the answer is "no."
Next, think about the banks. Let's say a bank has a $200,000 mortgage on a home and is
making a nice safe return on that mortgage. Now let's say hyper-inflation explodes and
the owner is "earning" $100,000 a month, soon to be $200,000/month. The owner peels off
10% of his pay and in a few months the mortgage is paid off. In terms of purchasing power,
the bank received peanuts for what was once a substantial store of value.
If you're the banker, how can you make money in a hyper-inflationary cycle? Whatever money
you loan today drops precipitously in value tomorrow, and so on, to near-zero.
The top 1% do own fixed assets, of course, just like the rest of us, and they are of course
diversified around the globe. But their U.S. liquid assets would be rendered worthless by
hyper-inflation. Why would they allow that cycle to take hold?
Finally, consider their position in a deflationary environment. Things are looking quite cheery
for the super-wealthy in a deflationary cycle. All their liquid assets buy more real
assets every month. Yes, perhaps there are another 30-40 million debt serfs struggling
to make ends meet below them, but the poor have always been present and it hasn't really
affected their wealth.
So which cycle serves the top 1%? The answer to that question is not hyper-inflation.
Therefore policies will not enable, support or allow a hyper-inflationary cycle to take hold.
It might be argued the policymakers are playing with a fire they don't understand; but my
entire point is those who hold the nation's wealth do understand that fire, and they will
never allow it to flare into a conflagration which destroys much of their wealth.
NOTE: contributions are humbly acknowledged in the order received.
Thank you, Renee S.-J. ($10), for your fifth donation in support of this
humble site. I am greatly honored by your ongoing contribution and readership.
All contributors are listed below in acknowledgement of my gratitude.
For more on this subject and a wide array of other topics, please visit
my weblog.
copyright © 2008 Charles Hugh Smith. All rights reserved in all media.
I would be honored if you linked this wEssay to your site, or printed a copy for your own use.
|
|