weblog/wEssays archives | home | |
The Hazards of Technical Analysis (June 9, 2007) The problem with technical analysis of the stock and bond market is the same one which plagues the rest of life: you can always find evidence for what you've already decided will happen. Here are Exhibits A, B and C: three respected technical analysts, all of whom were calling for "more upside" as their read of the charts indicated more bullish action--just days before the market started tanking: Marketwatch analyst Michael Ashbaugh, whose analysis swings all the way from super-bullish to mildly cautious, saw only more bullish gains ahead: Sentiment backdrop favors further upside (June 5, 2007) Barron's Michael Kahn has been warning of a toppy, ageing market for weeks, but he caved in on June 4 and hyped retail stocks--a surefire way to lose money as an exhausted, worried consumer finally gets a grip on reality, i.e. his or her wealth and income is declining daily even as their credit costs are rising: Retail Stocks on the Mend (June 4, 2007) Then there's Ralph Acampora, another perma-bull dating back to Louis Rukeyser's TV entertainment, Wall Street Week; unsurprisingly, Ralph sees bargains galore and a number of stocks set to begin huge multi-year rallies--in other words, same story as always: Charting the Bull's Next Move (June 4, 2007) In contrast, here were the entries you read here, explaining why bond yields had to rise: Why Interest Rates Will Have to Rise (May 30, 2007) or going back a bit further, to January's Inflation/Deflation V: Bonds and the Dollar (January 12, 2007) or March's Bonds, Interest Rates and Gold (March 6, 2007) And why the stock market looked ripe for a decline: Don't Cough (May 12, 2007) The Moon's a Balloon--And About to Pop (May 18, 2007) Stock Market Needs Suckers, John Q. Public Wary (June 1, 2007) Here is a 5-year chart of the long-bonds exchange-traded fund, the TLT. If you want to find some bullish evidence in this chart, you have quite a challenge: And here's the five-year chart of the Nasdaq, which I prefer over the narrow 30-stock Dow Jones Industrial Average, and the S&P 500, which has been distorted to some degree by the huge gains in financials (housing/mortgage/private equity debt bubble) and energy (oil rising from $20/barrel to $65/barrel). How low the Nasdaq will go this time around is anyone's guess, but the chart really offers no support to the perma-bull chartists quoted above. Am I just "finding Bearish cues" in these charts because that's what I've decided will happen? Perhaps--so look at the charts and make up your own mind about what they're indicating. For more on this subject and a wide array of other topics, please visit my weblog. copyright © 2007 Charles Hugh Smith. All rights reserved in all media. I would be honored if you linked this wEssay to your site, or printed a copy for your own use. |
||
weblog/wEssays | home |