weblog/wEssays | home | |
Greenspan & The Conundrum Effect (September 28, 2005) Talk about macroeconomic conundrums. Poor Federal Reserve chief Greenspan has mentioned three himself. To paraphrase: One term the Chairman never uses is the "wealth effect." Why? To paraphrase again: "Wealth effect? Are you nuts? That's like saying there's a housing bubble. People will panic in the streets if I admit that the wealth effect works great when housing is going up--everyone feels so rich they spend like there's no tomorrow. But the same mechanism works on the way down, too, after the bubble pops. People feel poorer than they actually are, and so they stop spending. Economic activity goes into a tailspin and then we've got the big R, recession, or worse. The bigger the bubble, the bigger the pop and then the bigger the drop in the wealth effect. But for goodness sakes, don't let on we know that. I retire in a few months and want to get out while the getting's good, before the whole thing blows up." Think I made this up? Please read today's Wall Street Journal article entitled Greenspan Says Fed's Success May Inflate Bubbles. "In perhaps what must be the greatest irony of economic policy making, success at stabilization carries its own risks," Mr. Greenspan said in a speech via satellite to a conference of the National Association for Business Economics in Chicago Tuesday.In other words: Yikes! Look out below. * * * copyright © 2005 Charles Hugh Smith. All rights reserved in all media. I would be honored if you linked this wEssay to your site, or printed a copy for your own use. * * * |
||
weblog/wEssays | home |